Thursday, 17 November 2011

What happened on November 10th at McGill University?


Better than any independent report is a collective report, this is an ever changing document and this is how it stands on November 17, 2011:  

English Version:

On November 10th, 2011, students and other residents of Montreal gathered to protest planned provincial tuition increases: a hike of $325 per year over the next five years, bringing tuition fees from $2,168 presently to $3,793 in 2017.[1]

In the morning, before the main downtown protest, students at Dawson College blocked entrances to their school, leaving only one door accessible, which was surrounded by protesters with signs.[2] Classes at the school were cancelled for the day.

The initial gathering point was the Berri–UQAM metro station at 2 PM.[3] The CBC estimated 20,000 people were present[4], though the police placed the numbers at 15,000 and the FÉUQ[5] at 30,000.[6] From there the protest marched up Berri, across Sherbrooke and toward Premier Jean Charest’s office on McGill College. Many violent protesters threw paint bombs and fireworks at the building[7] which had a police cordon in front of it before the protest arrived. At 4:30 PM, “flaming projectiles” were reported to have been thrown at police in front of Charest’s office.[8] By 4:41 PM, many protesters had left the area outside Charest’s office, leaving small groups, while police stayed on site.[9]

At approximately 3:45 PM, 14 protesters, some wearing bandanas (cite), attempted an occupation of the fifth floor of the James Administration building at McGill University[10]. The doors were unlocked as it was still during working hours for the building. Upon entrance, they raised their hands and announced a peaceful occupation of McGill Principal Heather Munroe-Blum’s office. After a banner reading “Nov 10. Occupons McGill!” was strung from the window, McGill Security violently swarmed the students. Security was called by the workers in the Principal’s office, who were allowed freedom to stay or go by the occupiers. When news of the force applied to students in the building reached the outside, the support for the occupation began to draw a large crowd of protesters to the McGill downtown campus to secure the safety and liberty of those inside[11].

As students and a few McGill professors (Adrienne Hurley, Ian Gold, Greg Mikkelson -- conversational/eyewitness accounts) gathered around the entrance to James Administration, the occupiers began to contact their supporters on the outside. The occupiers relayed the situation from inside: they claimed they were being physically assaulted by McGill security, thrown to the ground, kicked, and punched in the stomach.[12] The crowd outside began to strategize ways to help those on the inside.  At the front entrance, students tried negotiating their entrance, first suggesting to security that they allow a pair to go inside and confirm that the situation was peaceful before ceding to a single individual and finally asking for security to merely take a camera in and quickly film the happenings upstairs before returning it to the friends outside.  All such requests were denied.  Another phone call from within confirmed that the administration (citation needed) had called the police, and as it had become clear by then that there was no way to enter the building with McGill security forcefully blocking every entrance, supporters decided to instead prolong negotiations inside and protect their friends by blocking police from entering to the building by forming a human chain in front of every entrance: those on the side, front, and back. (*can this paragraph be rewritten to sound more impersonal?*)

Approximately 20 students stormed the second floor lobby of the building after somebody inside had left, and the security was unable to re-close the opened door. Pushing and shoving occurred with the security guards, and one girl was allegedly tackled on the ground by a security guard without being subsequently helped up by him. The security had to reform another wall past the lobby door so that more of the building wouldn’t be lost to the protesters. The protesters sat down in solidarity with those on the fifth floor[13]. The fifth floor occupiers negotiated for the unconditional release of everyone in the building, free of police charges or McGill disciplinary investigation, with Provost  Anthony Masi and Deputy Provost Morton Mendelson[14] .

At 16:52hrs[15], approximately 10 to 20 non-riot police on bikes arrived in front of the James Administration and stood by. The officers then attempted to push the crowd back with their bikes.  A police officer’s tire fell of his bike after forcefully hitting a student demonstrator.  Students cried out “shame”, denounced the confrontation before tossing projectiles -- signs and pickets -- at the police,[16] who then departed. There was at least one use of pepper spray at this point. (23)

At approximately 16:55hrs the police on bikes left[17], as riot police promptly arrived in vans from University Street, entering through the Milton Gates. They marched up to the entrance of the Administration building, striking their shields with batons, before standing off against a human chain of students hoping to prolong negotiations inside.  Students chanted for the safe release of the students inside and were by and large peaceably assembling aside from a small group who taunted and swore at police, while holding their ground.  In response, the riot police first used pepper spray on those students nearest the entrance and attempted to disband them. A sitting demonstrator received a kick in the face before a charge forward from the police that pushed demonstrators further back from the entrance. The police then proceeded to disperse the crowd gathered in front of the administration building with pepper spray, tear gas, batons and shields[18]
At 16.57hrs[19], riot police entered the Roddick Gates, circling and pushing protesters onto University Street with pepper spray and riot shields.[20] The Montreal Gazette reported that for the next hour, “horses and at least one tear gas grenade were used to push the lingering [protesters] onto Milton [Street].”[21]

Police proceeded to push students out of campus through the Milton gates. Here, riot police and police on bikes lined up in the middle of the intersection to allow kettled (source?) students out of the Milton gate area

Students who had not been a part of the protest and who just happened to be on campus were also allegedly harassed and pepper sprayed by the police (citation needed). McConnell Engineering Building was locked down as students moved inside to wash out pepper spray; other buildings around the Milton Gates were also locked to prevent students from entering or leaving.

Four arrests have been made by the SPVM (Montreal police force) due to aggressive behaviour toward police officers, theft, etc.[22] These four have been confirmed as three men and one woman.[23] (apparently only one was at mcgill. the other three were at the protest proper, though details are sparse)

Version «française» :

Le 10 novembre 2011, une manifestation organisée par l’Alliance sociale (syndicats, associations étudiantes, groupes communautaires) a eu lieu pour dénoncer, entre autres, la hausse des frais de scolarité de 1625$ sur cinq ans annoncée par le gouvernement Charest.

Le rassemblement a eu lieu au parc Émilie-Gamelin (station du métro Berri–UQAM) à 14h00. La CBC a annoncé qu’il y avait alors environ 20 000 personnes. Le SPVM avance pour sa part le nombre de 15 000 et la FEUQ, celui de 30 000. Lorsqu’il fut mis en branle, le cortège se dirigea d’abord sur Berri, puis sur Sherbrooke pour s’arrêter enfin sur la rue McGill College devant les bureaux du premier ministre Jean Charest. Quelques manifestants ont ensuite lancé des bombes de peinture et des feux d’artifice sur l’immeuble protégé par un cordon policier. À 16h30, des témoins rapportent avoir vu des projectiles en feu lancés aux policiers devant les bureaux de Charest. À 16h41, la grande majorité du cortège avait déjà quitté les lieux. Seuls de petits groupes et la police demeurèrent sur place.

À 17h, des policiers anti-émeutes ont passé le portail Roddick. Ils ont repoussé une partie des manifestants sur la rue University avec des lacrymogènes et leur bouclier.

À 17h44, il restait seulement un lieu problèmatique, le portail Milton (sur les rues Milton et University). Treize manifestants ont occupé le 5e étage de l’immeuble James (administration) à l’Université McGill, plus particulièrement le bureau de la rectrice Heather Monroe-Blum. Cette occupation a commencé à attirer une foule sur le campus.

 Les manifestants à l’intérieur de l’immeuble ont négocié avec les (???)

Environ 10 policiers sont arrivés en vélo et attendaient. Ils ont essayé de repousser la foule avec leurs vélos. La foule a repoussé la police et a lancé des ordures aux policiers qui se sont alors repliés.

Pour arriver à renvoyer les 13 manifestants dans l’immeuble, des employés de Sûreté McGill les ont bousculés et ont fait usage de coups de pieds.

Environ 4 minutes après, des policiers anti-émeutes sont arrivés sur la rue University. Ils se sont rendus a l’entrée de l’immeuble d’administration en frappant leur matraque sur leur bouclier. Là, ils ont fait face à la ligne d’étudiants qui protégait ceux restés à l’intérieur. Les étudiants ont scandé des slogans et ont crié aux policiers qu’ils ne bougeraient pas. Après une valse-hésitation, les policiers ont répliqué en utilisant des bombes lacrymogènes, des matraques, et des boucliers. On a dit qu’il y avait aussi des policiers à cheval. L’utilisation d’une grenade incapacitante a été avancée.
`
On a fermé l’immeuble McConnell (ingénierie) et d’autres immeubles près du portail Milton.

Le SPVM a arrêté quatre personnes pour voies de fait, vol, etc.


First-Hand Accounts

Official Responses:

Useful Twitter Accounts:
       McGill Tribune
       SPVM (Montreal Police)
       Le Delit Francais
       Justin Giovannetti
       Riley Sparks
       Adam Kovac

Articles:
       The Link
       The Gazette Live blog
       The Gazette
       Radio Canada (francais)
       The McGill Daily 1
       The McGill Daily 2
       The McGill Tribune
       CTV
       Globe and Mail
       Huffington Post

Photos:
       McGill Daily album
       SSMU album
       The Link album
       Tribune album


Videos:
       Riot Police at McGill University Protest

Twitter hashtags:
       #mcgill
       #nov10
       #non1625
       #realtalk
       #10nov (Francophone tweeters)
       #manifétudiante


[5] Quebec Federation of University Students
[13] first hand account (give a name), SSMU
[15] First hand account, Ross Brown (time taken from creation timestamp of source video uploaded to YouTube).
[17] First hand account, Ross Brown (time taken from creation timestamp of source video uploaded to YouTube). http://youtu.be/6Zz4HYaTnq4
[19] First hand account, Ross Brown (time taken from creation timestamp of source video uploaded to YouTube).

Monday, 14 November 2011

November 14th Speech - Riot Police on McGill Campus

I gave this speech during the assembly at McGill today: (these are un-edited notes)

I could give you a first hand account of what I experienced on thursday november 10th, but Id rather talk about something else. I want give a brief analysis of what we are doing today, in relation to what happened last thursday, in a broader context. if some of what I say is inaccessible, I encourage you to come and speak to me after.
this is my take, and i dont speak for anyone other than myself.

reminiscent of what happens during the G20 in toronto and other events around the world, I have heard attempts to demonize those who decide to take actions of civil disobedience, that go beyond the parameters set by the status quo. this is an important step to take in order to justify what is to come afterwards.

usually those who step over the line are set aside as examples for society to shame.
They are hooligans and trespassers and people who initiate violence.
They do not respect private property.
Do not fall prey to this rhetoric.

If the idea of resistance is designed and defined by law makers or politicans, it is no longer resistance. Its like creating a designated riot area, the square, as napoleon figured out, in order to vent anymore potential revolutions.
These systems of power have become much more sophisticated since then.

The task of the a resistance movement is to re-articulate these lines,
to re-articulate this square, as we are attempting to do today.
The point I am trying to make is this: a true culture of resistance must emerge on all fronts, behind the line, on the line, and in front of the line. This is how the line can be erased.

On thursday, we saw some of our colleagues use a type of civil disobedience which inched over the line. This small step over the line, maintained for a couple hours, and escalated slightly by the human chain outside and a sit down on the 2nd floor, illicited an unnecessary, heavy handed response by those who have taken an oath to protect and serve.
The occupation revealed 4 things. First, they reveal the deep insecurities of the powers that be. Second, they reveal the power that we hold, the fact that those who are unheard, really do have a voice. third, they also reveal the non-democratic structures that our university rests on.

how do we expect the whole of society to be democratic if we cant even have a voice in our local community? the fact is, our society, is not democratic one. it is a corporatocracy. i dont need to tell you that the structure of our society is one of double standards, where cut-throat capitalism exists for the poor, while bailouts exist for the rich.

I stand here today, not merely because of munaca and workers rights, not merely because of tuition increases, not merely because of injuctions and attacks on free speech..
I am standing here, because the very foundations of our society are corrupt, the foundations of our society rest upon a sophisticated set of coercive operations which attempt to make us completely and utterly powerless. Unfortunately, It seems that this institution, McGill, is also playing into this game. This stands in contrast to what Heather Munroe Blum believes, this morning on the CBC she stated that ‎"UNIVERSITIES ARE A PLACE OF SELF GOVERNANCE" I say, lets carry that through
So thats the 4th point. The actions on thursday revealed the inherent violence which our university, our community and our society as a whole rests upon.

now, if you disagree with any of these sentiments, i welcome it, and this is what this forum is about. But the fact is, this assembly would not exist if it wasnt for the actions of those who took a stand on thursday november tenth. those who valiantly fought to wake us up.

the core of a democratic assembly is not about making demands, or coming to conclusions, its not about majority rule, and its not about even coming to any agreements, although these things could definitely be apart of it. its about giving each and every one of us a voice within a community that listens. its about creating a real public sphere, one in which we can trully be proud to be apart of.
its a sad state of affairs when merely having a voice that can be heard is considered revolutionary.

i want to end with a fear that I have in common with a prominent preacher at occupy wall-street, slavoj zizek.
my greatest fear, is to have us, in 20-30 years, to think back at these moments, and think of them as 'the good old days' or 'the days when we were young.'

To reiterate, the actions taken on thursday point to issues that are not limited to the realm of this university. This is why a culture of resistance is necessary. but it must emerge on all fronts, on all grounds and it must be ongoing. this way, we can continually deconstruct any and all ever-recreating forms of unjust hierarchy and voicelessness.
Lets not make the same mistakes of the past, lets not fall asleep, lets continue to be lucid, lets rearticulate this space and turn it into a true public sphere, one in which all perspectives, at the very least, are respected and listened to. finally Lets make this last.

Saturday, 22 October 2011

A Culture of Resistance: Peaceful Censorship (How Occupy Wall Street will fail, part 1)

Occupy Wall Street is known for its peaceful pursuits. Simultaneously however, this pursuit is seemingly taking an absolutist and autocratic form. Both in the media and on the streets, reminiscent of what happens during the G20s, those who decide to take steps further, are demonized as "anarchists," and set aside as an example for society to shame. On the other hand, those who do step over the line look back at their liberal counterparts and label them as 'co-conspirators.' In certain contexts, 'demonization' can be helpful, as I am about to do now. You can try to rally the troops for either side, but if you are demonizing those who decide to stay behind, or go forth, one has already lost the war. Divide and Conquer. The point is, a culture of resistance must emerge on all fronts, behind the line, on the line, and in front of the line. This is how the line can be erased. The underlying meaning of a cartoon like this, approximates my message:

Friday, 21 October 2011

The New Map of the World : The Corporate Superstructure and the Interconnected Informational Substructure

A Revolution is Here. A new study has made what was already thought to be true an empirical reality. The modern electro-mechanic corporate person has dethroned its birth giver, the machine mother, the nation state. It is built on top of the concrete, brick and pavement of print culture, where repeatability and interchangeability once dominated, because inter-connectivity is the new name of the game.
The nation state cannot withstand the chaos that is growing atop its borders, its streets and its rigid steel grid design. The cold monster cannot even fathom this new emergence, nor does it realize this emergence is reshaping the very foundations which gave birth to it. Below the concrete, flows the lava of the information super highway where interconnectivity has seeped into the substructure as well. The cement has already begun to crumble.
However, faced with the pure anarchic chaos of the substructure, the superstructure is dependent on what it is helping to destroy, the crumbling culture of the old; both their survivals depends on an assimilation. To what degree, then, will this revolution be in the form of a creative destruction, and to what degree will all three structures be assimilated?